The State
Of
Working
Alabama

A Report and Agenda for Preserving and
Growing Good Jobs

 By
Jeff Rickert
& 

Howard Wial

 AFL-CIO Working for America Institute
Washington , DC 20003

 Executive Summary

This report takes an in-depth look at the economic situation of Alabama ’s working people, its key industries and major regions, and the workings of its state economic development policies.  It recommends public policies that can improve the competitiveness of the state’s key industries and the economic well being of its working people.

bullet Alabama workers made important gains in the late 1990s, but the recent recession and current jobless recovery may reverse those gains, and economic trends over the last two decades were not always favorable.
bullet
Alabama workers had a median wage of $11.50 per hour in 2001.  This was $1.56 per hour below the overall U.S. median hourly wage of $12.56.
bullet Alabama ’s median wage increased by $1.98 per hour, or 5.8 percent, between 1995 and 2001.  The national median wage increased by $1.08 per hour, or 0.6 percent, during that time.
bulletThe median hourly wage of African American men rose from $8.65 per hour in 1995 to $10.28 per hour in 2000 but fell back to $10.14 in 2001.  For African American women, the median hourly wage rose from $7.05 in 1995 to $8.74 in 2000 but fell back to $8.25 in 2001.  In contrast, the wages of white men and women rose from 1995-2000 and continued to rise in 2001.
bulletThe median hourly wages of men with a high school diploma but no further schooling rose from $10.38 in 1995 to $12.23 in 2000 but fell back to $12.00 in 2001.  For women with this level of schooling, the median hourly wage increased from $7.23 in 1995 to $8.43 in 2000 to $9.00 in 2001.  For men with college degrees, the median hourly wage rose from $19.72 in 1995 to $22.10 in 2000 but dropped back to $21.14 in 2001.  Women with college degrees saw their median hourly wage rise from $15.68 in 1995 to $16.33 in 2000 to $16.75 in 2001.
bulletThe wage gap between high- and low-wage workers has narrowed since 1995 but is higher than it was two decades ago.  In 1995, Alabama ’s high-wage workers earned 410 percent of what the state’s low-wage workers earned.  By 2001, this wage gap fell to 389 percent.  But the gap in 1979 was only 338 percent.
bulletThe share of Alabama workers earning poverty-level wages fell from 34.5 percent in 1979 to 29.5 percent in 2001.  Nationwide, the corresponding percentages were 26.6 percent in 1979 and 25.5 percent in 2001.
bullet Alabama is a major manufacturing state, but it has lost manufacturing jobs in recent years.  The loss of these jobs has meant that workers with low levels of schooling have lost an important source of good jobs.
bullet
In 2000, 19.3 percent of Alabama ’s jobs were in manufacturing, compared with 14.2 percent for the nation as a whole.
bulletWhile the state gained more than 94,000 jobs from 1995-2000 (a 5.3 percent increase), it lost more than 34,000 manufacturing jobs (an 8.6 percent loss).  From 2000-2002, Alabama lost12.5 percent of its manufacturing jobs from 2000-2002, while the nation as a whole lost 9.5 percent of its manufacturing jobs.
bulletIn 2001, 61.7 percent of Alabama ’s manufacturing workers had a high school diploma or less formal schooling, compared with 45.7 percent of all Alabama workers.
bulletKey Alabama manufacturing industries that pay high wages and are important to the economic competitiveness of the state as a whole or its major metropolitan areas include the paper industry (which paid an average weekly wage of $1121 per week in Mobile in 2000), the auto industry (average weekly wage of $890 statewide), the aerospace industry ($1193 in Huntsville), iron and steel foundries ($1051 in Birmingham), and non-ferrous metal manufacturing ($737 in Huntsville).  Average weekly wages in all these industries were higher than the 2000 statewide average weekly wage of $575.
bulletMost of the state’s key manufacturing industries have lost jobs in recent years.  Each faces important challenges to its competitiveness and ability to stem job losses and maintain high wages.
bulletFrom 1993-2000, Alabama ’s paper industry lost nearly 3,000 jobs.  Major economic challenges for the industry and its workers include outsourcing, domestic and foreign competitors with lower labor costs or more advanced technologies, and high energy costs due to energy-inefficient production processes.
bullet Alabama ’s auto industry gained more than 3,000 jobs from 1993-2000, in part as a result of state economic development incentives to auto assemblers, who brought new auto parts suppliers to the state.  Major economic challenges for suppliers and their workers include the need for auto suppliers to shift from standardized to more specialized products and to adapt to the changing demands of auto assemblers.
bulletThe Huntsville-area aerospace industry lost more than 700 jobs from 1995-2000.  The industry’s specialization in military production is an important source of competitive advantage but leaves it dependent on a single customer.
bulletThe state’s steel industry lost more than 2,000 jobs from 1989-2000, and the Birmingham area lost more steel jobs than the state as a whole.  Major economic challenges for the state’s integrated steel mills and their workers include competition from mini-mills, worldwide excess capacity in an internationally competitive steel market, high costs of environmental compliance, and high “legacy costs” of pensions and retiree health benefits.
bulletThe nonferrous metal industry lost jobs from 1993-2000, but some subsectors gained jobs.  Major economic challenges for the industry and its workers include outsourcing and the challenges of shifting to more specialized products and adopting technologies that raise labor productivity.
bullet
The state’s current economic development policies emphasize subsidies to companies that can bring new jobs to Alabama .  They do little to assist firms in the state’s already established key industries in retaining good jobs while remaining competitive.
bullet Alabama can reorient its public policies, especially economic development  policies, to improve the competitiveness of the state’s key industries and the economic well being of its working people.  To do so, the state should:
bulletreorient its economic development programs toward retaining jobs rather than attracting them, by

§         providing economic development assistance to firms that offer high-quality jobs and are in industries that are key to regional economies in the state;

bulletinvesting in targeted research and development support for key industries in the state;
bulletproviding education and training to support the adoption of new technologies and the implementation of new product lines by firms in the state’s key industries;
bulletopening access to the power grid to allow companies that produce their own energy to sell excess power to utilities or to obtain credits for reducing their burden on the public grid;
bulletproviding incentives and support for companies to adopt energy-efficiency measures, including investments in technology, training, and operation and maintenance;
bulletproviding targeted assistance to help displaced workers secure high-quality jobs; and
bulletproviding support to multi-employer partnerships that work to eliminate common problems that hamper the vitality of a key regional industry;
bullet
link economic development resources to job quality
by
bulletinstituting “clawback” provisions or other protections that guarantee that firms receiving economic or workforce development assistance deliver on job quality or job quantity standards and
bulletextending “anti-piracy” provisions to economic development incentives that do not currently have such provisions;
bullet
make economic development activity more transparent
by
bulletinstituting job quality standards in the current economic development system and
bulletstrengthening and enforcing company-specific subsidy disclosure laws;
bullet
raise minimum job quality standards
by
bulletrationalizing health care via a state-sponsored health plan through which all Alabama employers would provide coverage for their employees and
bulletsetting a state minimum wage.

Introduction

During the late 1990s, when Alabama ’s economy produced good times for the state’s working people, public policymakers paid little attention to the economic problems of the state’s major industries and the effects of public policy on those industries.  Changes in state policy did not seem to be needed to keep unemployment low, wages rising, and jobs growing.  But in the wake of the recent recession and the current jobless recovery, there is room for state policy to play an important role in restoring prosperity. 

This report takes an in-depth look at the economic situation of Alabama ’s working people, its key industries and major regions, and the functioning of its state economic development policies.  It recommends public policies that can improve the competitiveness of the state’s key industries and regions and improve the economic well-being of its working people.  The report begins with a statistical portrait of Alabama ’s jobs and workers, both statewide and in the state’s four largest metropolitan areas.  Drawing on the results of interviews with employers and union leaders as well as on published sources, it then describes the economic problems facing the state’s key manufacturing industries, industries that are crucial to the prosperity of the state as a whole and especially to that of Alabama workers with little formal schooling.  The report then describes Alabama ’s economic development policies, illustrating the ways in which they fail to meet the needs of workers and employers in key manufacturing industries.  The report concludes with recommendations for improving state economic policy, especially economic development policy.

Alabama ’s Jobs and Workers

This section provides a statistical overview of the economic status of Alabama ’s working people.  It focuses on wages, wage inequality, employment, unemployment and workforce characteristics.  To put Alabama ’s current economic situation in perspective, the report compares today’s Alabama with Alabama at various times over the last two decades and it sometimes compares Alabama ’s economic performance with that of the entire nation and with that of surrounding states.  We rely mainly on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and the Census Bureau, especially the joint BLS-Census Current Population Survey (CPS).  Throughout the report, dollar amounts are adjusted for inflation and expressed in 2001 dollars (i.e., the buying power of wages at 2001 prices) using the CPI-U-RS, a consumer price index developed by BLS.

Alabama workers made substantial gains during the late 1990s—in overall wages; low unemployment; narrowing wage gaps between high- and low-wage earners; and rapid wage growth for women, African Americans and workers without college degrees.  As Alabama and the nation entered the recession that began in March 2001, unemployment rose and African American workers’ wages fell, but other economic gains continued.  However, these gains were probably due in large measure to extremely tight labor markets, especially for low-wage workers.  Such tight labor markets are unusual even during periods of economic growth and probably did not continue as the recession deepened.  They are unlikely to persist during the slow, jobless economic recovery that the state and nation are now experiencing.  Moreover, Alabama has been losing jobs in manufacturing, a sector that has historically provided good jobs for workers without college degrees.  Wages in manufacturing have also grown slowly during the 1990s.  Without public policies and employer and union strategies to preserve high-wage jobs in manufacturing and other key industries, the gains made by Alabama ’s workers in the late 1990s may not continue and could even be reversed.

Alabama Wage Growth Remained Strong Even As Recession Began

The median wage—the wage that falls in the middle of those of all workers—is the best measure of the overall economic well-being of Alabama ’s workers.  (Half the state’s workers earn more than the median wage, while half earn less.)  By this measure, Alabama ’s workers became much better off during the late 1990s; the state’s median wage rose by more than 20 percent from 1995 through 2001, from $9.52 per hour to $11.50 per hour (table 1).  The wage growth of the late 1990s, which was probably due to an extremely tight labor market, more than made up for a decade and a half of declining wages during the 1980s and early 1990s.  Even as Alabama and the nation entered the recession in 2001, Alabama workers’ wages continued to grow relatively rapidly, rising by 5.8 percent from 2000 to 2001.

Wages in Alabama remain below wages nationwide.  The wage gap between Alabama and the nation as a whole was similar in 2001 to what it was in 1979.  In 1979, Alabama ’s median wage was about 91 percent of the U.S. median wage.  In 2001, the corresponding figure was about 92 percent.  Alabama ’s workers took bigger wage cuts in the 1980s and early 1990s than those in the United States as a whole, but they also received larger raises since 1995 than their U.S. counterparts.

Table 1.  Median Hourly Wages in Alabama and United States, 1979-2001 (2001 dollars)

 

All workers

 

Men

 

 

Women

 

 

AL

U.S.

 

AL

U.S.

 

AL

U.S.

1979

10.50

11.64

 

13.30

14.37

 

7.81

9.14

1989

10.04

11.57

 

11.74

13.93

 

8.28

9.94

1995

9.52

11.48

 

11.58

13.10

 

8.11

10.16

2000

10.87

12.49

 

12.64

14.08

 

9.47

10.96

2001

11.50

12.56

 

13.02

14.25

 

10.13

11.12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1979-2001

9.5

7.9

 

-2.1

-0.8

 

29.7

21.7

1989-2001

14.5

8.6

 

10.9

2.3

 

22.3

11.9

1995-2001

20.8

9.4

 

12.4

8.8

 

24.9

9.4

2000-2001

5.8

0.6

 

3.0

1.2

 

7.0

1.5

Source: WAI analysis of CPS outgoing rotation groups.

Women’s Wages Grew Rapidly, Men’s Remained Below 1979 Level

The state’s recent strong wage growth is due mainly to extremely rapid increases in women’s wages (table 1).  Alabama women earned nearly 25 percent more per hour in 2001 than in 1995 and 7 percent more in 2001 than in 2000.  Men’s wages grew much more slowly than women’s.  Alabama men earned just over 12 percent more in 2001 than in 1995 and 3 percent more in 2001 than in 2000.  Men’s wages in 2001 were still about 2 percent below their 1979 level, while women’s were almost 30 percent above their 1979 level.

Alabama Wages Slipped from Highest to Second Highest in Region Since 1979

Alabama ’s workers have lost ground compared with those of neighboring states.  In 1979, Alabama ’s median wage was higher than that of any of its neighboring states (figure 1).  By 1989, though, it had slipped to third highest in its region, below the median wages in Georgia and Florida .  By 2001, Alabama had moved ahead of Florida but remained behind Georgia . 

Source: WAI analysis of CPS outgoing rotation groups.

Alabama ’s wage advantage over lower-wage neighboring states has also shrunk over the last two decades.  In 1979, Alabama ’s median wage was about 18 percent (or $1.60 per hour) higher than that of its lowest-wage neighbor, Mississippi .  By 1989, Alabama ’s wage advantage over Mississippi had shrunk to 15 percent ($1.30 per hour) and by 2001 it was down to only 8 percent (88 cents per hour). 

Wages Stagnate for African Americans, Reversing Late 1990s Trend

The recession that began in March 2001 reversed the late 1990s trend of wage growth for African American men and women in Alabama .  Black workers’ wages overall were unchanged from 2000 to 2001, while white workers received a 5.8 percent raise in that year (table 2).  Both black men and black women took wage cuts, with black women’s wages falling by a greater percentage than black men’s.  In contrast, both white men and white women received raises, and white women received a larger raise than white men. 

Table 2.  Median Hourly Wages in Alabama by Race and Sex, 1979-2001 (2001 dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent change

 

 

 

1979

1989

1995

2000

2001

1979-2001

1989-2001

1995-2001

2000-2001

WHITE

11.30

10.72

10.81

11.82

12.50

10.6

16.6

15.6

5.8

White men

14.12